Welcome to my blog. I will be posting some practical and reflective thoughts regarding the peculiar speech known as preaching. I invite you to offer comments and ask questions in this virtual community of people who recognize that preaching matters.
Search This Blog
Friday, April 14, 2017
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
MLK's Powerful Practices for Preachers
The Christian preaching of MLK
Jr. didn’t merely inspire a congregation, which would be no small task; it
inspired a movement, the Civil Rights Movement. It wouldn’t be stretch to
assert that King’s preaching was the primary, if not sole, initiator of social
transformation in America during the 1960’s.
Although the zenith of King’s preaching sits on a mountaintop that is more than a half century in the distance behind us, there is so much that contemporary preachers can learn from “the Preacher King” and employ today. And, who knows, maybe the Holy Spirit will use our preaching, like he did King’s, to bring about the social transformation so many of us crave.
Although the zenith of King’s preaching sits on a mountaintop that is more than a half century in the distance behind us, there is so much that contemporary preachers can learn from “the Preacher King” and employ today. And, who knows, maybe the Holy Spirit will use our preaching, like he did King’s, to bring about the social transformation so many of us crave.
Whole volumes have been written
on the powerful preaching practices of King. Most of those are worth the time
and money. In this brief article, however, I will sketch out only four of those
practices. We will explore how these practices are evident in King’s Dream
Speech, in particular, but they are unmistakably mixed into the corpus of his
best sermons.
Know
Your Context:
King was a man of his time. He had a pulse on what was going on in his
congregation, community, region, nation, and world. One gets the sense from
hearing King preach that he thought and prayed long and hard about how a given
biblical text or topic might intersect with the hopes and hurts of people in
his day and age. Sermons, at least the best ones, are not only true to the
biblical text but to the contemporary context in which they are proclaimed. One
of the ways to tell that a sermon is highly contextual is that it will not be
nearly as powerful if preached the same way in a different context.
King preached powerfully to the
historical situation of his day. In the Dream Speech he said, “It would be
fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment.” King himself
discerned the “urgency of the moment” in his contextual preaching. He read
broadly, conversed with a diversity of people, and, then, put the Gospel in a
contextual container from which the people of his day could drink.
After you exegete the text for
the sermon, spend a faithful amount of time prayerfully reflecting on how the
text intersects with what is going on in the lives of people in your
congregation, community, region, nation and world. Your best illustrations and
applications will surface from this interface between text and context.
Develop
A Mantra:
Most college and seminary professors “preach” to students about the laziness
and ineloquence of repetition in academic writing. “Don’t say the same thing
the same way twice,” they beg. Perhaps that’s a wise practice for writing, but
not for preaching, as King proves. He carefully crafted and repeated mantras
with significant impact. The most famous mantras from the Dream Speech are, “I
have a dream” and “let freedom ring.” These mantras still evoke passion and
reflection today. Another mantra in the Dream Speech, and one that doesn’t get
as much notice, is “we can never be satisfied” with the status quo of segregation.
When you finish writing your
sermon, read through it several times looking for a phrase or sentence that
captures the essence, or focus, of the sermon. Then, identify the best
locations in the sermon to repeat the mantra. There is no hard and fast rule
regarding how often to repeat the mantra, but 4-6 times in rapid succession or 7-10
times spread out are good rules of thumb.
Offer
Winsome Challenge:
King had the capacity, like the Christ he proclaimed, to speak hard truth with
delightful grace. Jesus “came from the Father full of grace and truth” (John
1:14), and all truly Christian preaching will embody the same. King
courageously challenged the injustices of his day without softening the blow of
his words. He voiced in the Dream Speech:
“But one hundred years later
[after the abolition of slavery in America], the Negro still is not free. One
hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the
manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years
later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast
ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still
languished in the corners of American society and finds himself in exile in his
own land. So we have come here today to dramatize an shameful condition.”
King challenged but also found a
way to connect with people on the opposite side of an issue from him. Although
many whites and some blacks didn’t agree with his message or tactics, they
could not deny, and were often won over, by King’s winsomeness. Here is a
snippet of winsome grace from the Dream Speech:
“And when this happens, and when
we allow freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet,
from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all
of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and gentiles, Protestants and
Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro
spiritual, "Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at
last!"
The hard, brutal truth that King
shared was sifted through his love for people and God. Winsome messages can
come across as fluff. Challenging messages can come across as angry. Try to
embody winsome challenge, or grace and truth, in the development and delivery
of your next sermon. As you read through your upcoming message, ask yourself
“Does this need more grace or truth, more winsomeness or challenge?” Then, add
a dash of either or both. Your delivery demeanor may also need one or the other
or both. Watching the delivery of your sermon, as painful as that may be for
some of us, can reveal if we need more grace and/or truth.
Employ
A Metaphor:
King was, well, a king at imagery. He used the metaphor of a dream, a
mountaintop, and a bad check in his Dream Speech. King found a way to concretize
concepts so that they were hard to forget. Metaphorical imagery imprints ideas
on the heads and hearts of human beings. King knew this and employed it with
noteworthy impact.
So much of what we preach about
is conceptual at best and downright esoteric at worst. Listeners often get lost
in a sea of ambiguous ideas. We flesh out these ideas with metaphorical
imagery. King could have simply said, “We have come here today to seek our
inalienable rights as American citizens.” Instead, he used metaphorical
imagery:
“But we refuse to believe that
the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are
insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. So we
have come to cash this check- a check that will give us upon demand the riches
of freedom and the security of justice.”
As you write your next sermon,
think of metaphorical imagery you can employ to concretize the concepts, and
ground faith in the realities in which people “live, and move and have their
being.”
Is there metaphorical imagery
from sports, science, marriage and family, dating, elementary school, the
medical profession, your last trip to the dentist, shopping at the mall, or
from any arena of life that will align tightly with the thrust of your sermon?
Employ a metaphor and watch your sermon come to life for people.
Friday, December 2, 2016
Social Media as a Spiritual Discipline?
I just spent 5 minutes scrolling through Facebook. Now, I feel
as dirty as a teenage boy who looked at porn for the first time. Where’s the
shower! Seriously, even casual engagement with social media can often leave us
feeling angry, hopeless, jealous, inferior, self-righteous, desperate, and judgmental.
Social media can leave us filthy without us even realizing why. I wonder about
the impact of social media upon divorce, violence, division, and depression.
Would the world be better off without social media?
Well, I’m not ready to throw the baby out with the bath
water and here’s why. God has always found a way to inhabit our way of life. In
an ancient world that revolved around religious cultic practices and governmental
law, God established the religious sacrificial system and 10 commandments to
govern his people, the Israelites. To reach 1st century Jews, God
came to us as a first century Jew named Jesus. God has a way of employing the
tools of a particular culture to reach that culture. He forms people right
where they “live and move and have their being.” Social media is where we live.
But can God redeem it?
What if we engaged social media not in ways that make us
feel dirty but in ways that foster our formation? Maybe social media can be for
us a spiritual discipline like fasting, bible study, and worship. I’m convinced,
that while social media can certainly be
a means of oppression and depression, it has the potential to be a premier tool
God uses to deepen our faith and increase our love.
Let’s explore just a few of the many ways we can engage social
mediums like Facebook and Twitter as a spiritually formative discipline. Please
comment by sharing some ideas of your own, maybe even stuff you’re already
practicing. If more and more followers of Christ practice the ideas below, as
well as the ones you’ll present, social media won’t feel so dirty. I confess
that I’ve fallen into the trap of allowing the popular practices of social
media to deform instead of form me. But as we head into the new year soon, I’m
turning over a new tweet!
-Take a Prayer Scroll:
Scroll through your Facebook feed prayerfully. Read the post of friends and
family members trying to discern the hopes and hurts beyond their posts. Then,
pray for them as led by God’s Spirit. If you come across a shared story from a
news network about racial violence, a natural disaster, political shaming, or
some other painful reality, pray for God’s intervention. The typical knee-jerk
response, at least for me, is to post my words for the public to see instead of
voice my prayer in private for God to hear. Let’s pray before we post. Or, let’s
pray and not post. Try to start your day with a prayer scroll. Perhaps you can
commit the first 10-15 minutes of your Facebook, Twitter or Instagram diversion
to prayer.
-Celebrate Others:
Let’s be honest, so often what we post is a not-so-veiled attempt to get people
to notice our wisdom, accomplishments, cute kids, wonderful spouse, home décor
or articles (like I’m doing nowL).
Of course, this is not an entirely dirty use of social media. We should be able
to share what’s going on in our lives with family and friends. But, what if we
focused more on highlighting the wisdom and achievements of others more than
showcasing our own? It would drastically change social media. I know people
whose use of social media is entirely focused on celebrating others. You know
someone like that? Imitate that person. The next time you are on Facebook, celebrate
someone else by sharing their post or liking their picture. When you open
Twitter, retweet someone else’s profound statement, book announcement, or
thoughtful article. You get the idea. Or simply offer an original post or tweet
that celebrates another person or group. Try to celebrate others via social media
at least 5-10 times daily.
-Speak for the
Oppressed: Social media is full of rants, which is why some of us take an
occasional sabbatical from it. But the negative ranting is no reason for us not
to use social media to speak up for those who can’t, won’t or don’t speak up for
themselves. In order to get a hearing in a sea of ranting, we will need to
expose injustice in thoughtful, gracious, forthright and loving ways. “Jesus
came from the father full of grace and truth” (John 1:14). Grace and truth are
good guidelines for social media engagement. Be a voice for the people for whom
Jesus was a voice. Post or tweet something that exposes the plight of the poor,
mentally ill, persecuted and socially ostracized. Expose the ugliness of human
trafficking and drug addiction, as well as political policies and economic
systems that marginalize people. Be a voice for the voiceless and invite your Facebook
friends and Twitter followers to do the same.
Jump in. Help us out. Add your ideas.
Lenny
Thursday, September 1, 2016
Wednesday, June 22, 2016
Are You a Modern or Postmodern Preacher?
Preachers
and preaching have changed dramatically over the past few decades. While we don’t
refer to the categories of “Modern” and “Postmodern” as often as we used to, all
of us have been primarily shaped by one or the other. I’ve written the playful
dialogue below for my Narrative Preaching elective course. I play the part of
the interviewer and invite two students to play either the part of the Modern
Preacher or the Postmodern Preacher. The sketch below presents a generalized,
maybe even stereotyped, caricature of the two sides. The goal is to playfully
get at distinct preaching trends in each category. Read the interview and consider
the one with whom you identify most.
Interviewer: Hi, I am going to
be interviewing two preachers who represent two very different approaches to
preaching God’s word. I invite them to introduce themselves.
Modern
Preacher:
Hello, I am a preacher whose ministry style and convictions have been shaped
mostly by Modernity. You can call me Mo.
Postmodern
Preacher:
You can call me Po. I have been shaped mostly by the Postmodern context in
which I live.
Interviewer: My first question
is, How do you view Scripture? Mo, why don’t you start.
MO: That’s easy. Scripture
is God’s timeless word to temporal people. It is inspired and inerrant. The
bible is full of objective and absolute principles for living. If people would
just learn to live by biblical principles, their lives and relationships with
God and others would be much healthier.
PO: I view scripture
not as a bunch of principles detached from each other but as a unified account
that tells one grand story. Once one begins to see her story in light of the
biblical story, life becomes meaningful and worth living. The Bible is a story
book not a proposition or principle book.
Int: Isn’t the bible full
of both principles and stories? Aren’t there principles derived from the story,
and stories that are behind and lead to the principles? It seems to me the
bible does tell one grand story, but throughout the biblical story there are
principles that can be applied to life as long as those principles are not
disconnected from relationship with God. In other words, the principles don’t
work unless a relationship with God is at the center. Okay, next question, what
makes a sermon biblical?
PO: If the sermon is
authentic and faithful to the biblical text and to the contemporary context, it
is biblical. Even if the preacher never opens the bible, the sermon could be
more biblical than the sermon that strings together 10 different passages, cut
and paste style.
MO: Hold on! You’re
telling me that a sermon could be biblical without a passage being read. That’s
not true. People need to know that the word of the preacher is coming from the
word of God. A biblical sermon will have at least one or, preferably, more
passages read during the sermon and, even better, the preacher will work word
by word, phrase by phrase, verse by verse through the passage that is read.
PO: That sounds like
bible-olotry. The bible in and of itself doesn’t have power apart from
relationship with God. I can preach a sermon without reading any scripture at
all that is more biblical than the sermon where the preacher quotes 9 passages,
assuming that what I am saying aligns with the contours of the biblical story.
MO: You can’t have a
sermon without a bible passage. That’s just a talk or a devotional or a speech.
You need a text to have a sermon.
PO: Nope, you need a
relationship with God to have a sermon. And your sermon must align with the
contours of the biblical meta-narrative.
Int: Well, maybe we need
both a biblical text and a relationship with God to be able to preach a sermon.
Next question…how do you typically structure your sermon?
MO: I structure my
sermon around the main points of the text. For some reason, I usually end up
with three points. These points are the bridge between the bible and my people,
they are propositional truths that grow out of the text but connect in relevant
ways to my context. People can leave the sermon event with something to apply
to their life situations. I also give my people an outline so they can write down
the points, usually fill-in-the-blanks. The sermon structure is neat, linear,
and logical. I want the sermon to inform and make sense to people.
PO: I want my sermon to
inspire people, even if it doesn’t make sense. I try not to give into the temptation
to tidy everything up in a neat sermonic package. I want people to feel the
angst and disequilibrium that may come from the biblical story. For this
reason, I don’t structure my sermon into linear points, which seem good at
information but not inspiration. Instead I structure my preaching of a text
(yes, I do use the bible) around the elements of narrative like setting,
problem, climax, and resolution. This seems to draw people in so that they
experience the powerful plot of the text in the preaching moment, instead of
merely going home with their outline filled in. To me, the inspirational
experience listeners have during the
sermon matters more than the information they take away after the sermon.
Int: I wonder if both
kinds of sermons are needed. Aren’t there times when a sermon needs to be more
didactic and logical? And aren’t there other times when a sermon should inspire
change instead of simply inform? And, shouldn’t the genre and flow of the
passage being preached determine, at least to some extent, whether the sermon
uses a linear or narrative structure? I can see I’m upsetting you, so I will
get to the next question. Let’s talk about important but secondary issues such
as delivery style. How would you describe your preaching style?
PO: I try to be
conversational, since I don’t see myself as the ultimate authority on God or
his word. I simply talk to people and try to create a sense of dialogue with
them. I invite them to be participants with me in discovery. I often develop
sermons that raise more questions than the sermon answers. Sometimes, I think
we preachers try to answer more questions than we have answers for. I want the
sermon to be crafted, in a sense, communally not authoritatively. I want it to
feel like a dialogue not a monologue.
MO: But you are the
authority, anointed by God and trained to interpret the scriptures and proclaim
good news. You are not called to “talk” to people; you are called to
prophetically challenge people to conform to the image of Christ! The bible
does have answers! What do you mean when you say your sermon raises more
questions than it may answer? Are you a relativist or a proclaimer of truth?
PO: Of course I
proclaim truth but I also invite listeners to be participants with me in the
construction of truth. I believe we get at truth best when we invite multiple
voices and considerations into the dialogue. Narrative presents just as much
truth as propositions; but narrative invites people into the process of
discovering truth instead of simply sitting back and filling in blanks.
MO: Are you saying that
even nonbelievers can help the church get at truth? Can’t you see how this
could lead the church off-track-if any Tom, Dick, or Harry is helping to craft
truth? Are you an advocate of relativism and pluralism?
PO: Easy there, narrow-minded
one! I believe the truth of the Gospel can stand up and shine even when less
than perfectly reliable sources are engaged in getting at the truth. God even
used Balaam’s donkey in the bible to speak truth.
Int: Can’t the preacher
be both a prophetic authority and a communal conversationalist? Don’t you think
that the preacher who is sensitive to congregational voices might actually
increase his/her authority as a proclaimer? And, doesn’t your congregational
context determine, to some extent, how you preach?
PO: I am preaching
mostly to people ages 20-45. Many of them don’t even believe in the validity of
the bible, but all of them are willing to explore a relationship with Christ.
They are more interested in encounter with God than an encounter with
principles. In my opinion, narrative sermons are better at creating an
experience through which young adults encounter God.
MO: Most of the people
in my congregation are between 45-70. We are mostly Boomers who want to know
how the Bible works in real life. We want life-application. Our lives are
complicated enough. We don’t want more tension and questions; we want clarity
and answers. My people don’t want me beating around the bush. They want me to
be clear and concise about the bottom line.
INT: You guys would make
a great teaching team at an inter-generational church full of people with a
diversity of needs when it comes to the preaching event. MO, young adults need
to hear linear sermons that are clear and full of life-application from time to
time. And PO, the Boomers and Builders need to explore the Gospel tensions that
they may have uncritically assumed for far too long. Plus, there are multiple
learning styles within each generation. Therefore, mixing up preaching styles is
helpful. If you didn’t feel led to leave your present ministry positions, I
wonder if each of you would be willing to explore the possibility of preaching
like the other person from time to time. What do you say?
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
The Best Preachers are the Best Listeners
As part of
my doctoral studies, my cohort and I visited Seoul Korea. We were hosted by the
Kwanglim United Methodist Church, one of the largest churches in the world. The
church had 50,000 members at the time. How can church leaders care for and
disciple 50,000 people?
The Korean
pastors had a unique way of accomplishing this. The church employed
approximately 30 pastors whose primary ministry was to visit the homes of all
church members annually. Every one of the 50,000 members received a visit each
year! I had the privilege of observing one of these visits. Shortly after
arriving in the member’s home, the pastor would sit on the floor, a Korean
custom, across from the church member. The pastor invited the member to detail
what was going on in her life, including any prayer requests. The pastor
listened intently. Then, when the member was finished sharing the good, bad,
and ugly in her life, the pastor preached a 10 minute mini-sermon that was
geared specifically to the needs of this member. In other words, the pastor first
listened with his heart, mind, soul, and strength and then spoke with the same.
The best
preachers seem to be the best listeners. The preacher who lives among the people,
listening to their dreams, disappointments, and delights, will be able to
preach with profound insight and relevance. There are several ways that a
pastor can “listen” to the congregation at a profound level that is sure to foster
profound preaching.
OBSERVATION
“Listen” to your congregation before,
during, and after you preach. If you aren’t speaking next Sunday, do this while
another pastor preaches. Look around the room and observe the moods of the
people. Do people seem anxious, bored, tired, energized, or open? What were
their reactions to different parts of the sermon? What parts of the sermon
seemed to connect with them most? What parts of the sermon seemed to flop?
Perhaps you can videotape the congregation during the service so you can review
it after the event.
INTERVIEW
Interview five members per one hundred people in the
church you serve who are diverse in terms of age, spiritual maturity, gender,
ethnicity, and class. Ask each of them to list three characteristics of good preaching
and three that describe bad preaching. If possible, follow up with clarifying
questions regarding any ambiguous statements. You can do these interviews via
email, phone call, or in person. Perhaps you will want to use a combination of
these interview formats.
SURVEY
If
you are going to distribute an open-ended survey to your entire congregation
during a worship service it has to be clear and brief. Try limiting the survey
to only 3-5 questions. What open-ended questions can you ask the entire
congregation in a survey that will accurately reveal the preaching needs and preferences
of your congregants? Here are a few questions to consider including in your
survey to the congregation: Why do you attend church? What three things do you
need most right now? How would you describe your relationship with God? What do
you hope for from the weekly sermon? How would you describe the preaching in
the church? When you receive all of the data from the survey perhaps you can
take a retreat to reflect on and listen to the hearts of your people. If you
have some researchers in your church, maybe they can analyze and categorize the
content from the survey.
Listening long and hard to the needs
of people in your congregation will enable you to speak into their lives with
refreshing depth. The best listeners are the best preachers because they
scratch where their people itch most.
EXERCISES
1. Read
the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7) and reflect upon how the sermon confirms that
Jesus was insightfully aware of peoples’ deepest needs.
2. Upon
completing the observation, interviews, and survey, respond to the following two
questions: How must my preaching change? How must my preaching not change?
Tuesday, February 23, 2016
An Election Year Plea to Preachers
According to the polls, Donald Trump is the leading
candidate among Evangelicals. To me, this is clear sign that the American Dream
has replaced the Christian Gospel. The American Dream that compels me to make a
way for myself, to “get mine,” could not be more contrary to the Gospel of the Christ
who came to give not to get, to empower the marginalized not to extol the
powerful.
Donald Trump has made more than a few comments
denigrating women, minorities, and the poor. Listen to any speech he gives and
you will quickly note the arrogance and egotism that drives him. Narcissism
hangs all over him like a bad $4000 suit. Yet, Trump is the leading candidate among
Evangelicals. How can this be? I don’t hate Trump or want to demonize him. I
pity him. My expectations for Trump are rather low. However, my expectations
for the Church of Jesus Christ, the one who came to serve in selfless love, are
really high. Frankly, I am disappointed not in Trump or the Republican Party. I’m
heart-broken by the Church for even considering a candidate like Trump to be not
only viable but desirable.
Perhaps Trump, if elected, will get us closer to the American
Dream than many of us under 50 have ever been. Taxes will be cut. Illegals will
be booted and kept out so we have more. If taxes are cut and illegals are gone,
we might end up with enough discretionary income to buy a second or, better
yet, a third car. A larger home in a better neighborhood is a likely result. But
will we better off?
The Gospel of Jesus Christ in more than a few ways flies
in the face of the American Dream. In fact, one cannot simultaneously chase the
“stake my claim” dream of the West and the values of the Christ. That split
allegiance leads inevitably to a double life that tares the soul in two.
Professing Christianity while practicing Trumpianity will lead to disastrous
disintegration.
How do we fix this thing? Enter the Christian preacher.
While preaching, in part, may have gotten us into this mess, I’m convinced
preaching may be the way out. Maybe it’s time for preachers to change the title
of our sermon series from How to Manage
Your Money to Overcoming American
Greed with Christian Generosity, from The
Road to a Better You to Making the World
a Better Place, from Your Best Life
Now to The Christ-Life Now. To
the point, preaching in America, perhaps now more than ever, must articulate
the distinction between Americanology and Christology, calling the Church to
forsake the former to embrace the latter.
I’m not suggesting that preachers ought to stand up this
Sunday and rail against Trump with hair-fire, I mean hell-fire and brimstone. As
tempting as this might be for some of you, it will merely apply a temporary band-aid
to a surgical need. The better way is, as is often the case, the longer way. If
we preach “Christ and him crucified,” as Paul did, over and over again, Sunday
after Sunday after Sunday, in creatively insightful ways, the tide will turn.
If we preach the will and the way of Christ in a winsome and faithful manner
now, when another Trump-like figure arises in a decade promising to fulfill our
self-centered dreams, we won’t budge from the anchor of the cross.
Am I oversimplifying complex issues with a simplistically
myopic response? Well, you make the call. Just don’t say I’m ugly or assume that
I’m a criminal because of my ancestry or build a wall to keep me out of your
sight. That wouldn’t be very Christian.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)